|

Venture
Philanthropy
Guide.org
Natasha van
Bentum, CFRE
|
Why venture philanthropy?
"It is ironic that in a time of unprecedented prosperity and wealth
creation, there is still chronic poverty and significant income inequality.
The already large gap between rich and poor has widened even more dramatically.
However there is a convergence of broader forces at work that have set
the stage for a fundamentally different approach to philanthropy, one
that learns from the past while drawing upon the best practices of today
and the New Economy: venture philanthropy." -- Venture
Philanthropy Partners
Sociologist Paul Schervish, Director of the Social Welfare
Research Institute at Boston College is best noted for his
report "Millionaires and the Millennium: New Estimates of the Forthcoming
Wealth Transfer and the Prospects for a Golden Age of Philanthropy" which
estimates the wealth transfer over the next half century to be between
$41 trillion and $136 trillion."
His paper, written with John J. Havens, "The New Physics of Philanthropy:
The Supply-Side Vectors of Charitable Giving" (available in PDF format:
part
1, part
2) provides insight into the zeitgeist of new philanthropy.
Weakness of Traditional Foundations
- Venture philanthropy advocates say most traditional foundations are
too program and project driven and that they wrongly view the long-term
needs of their grantees as extraneous overhead.
- Foundations, they say, don't do enough to help charities recruit and
train qualified staff members, improve their computer and accounting
systems, or develop sophisticated tools to track the results of social
service programs.
- As a result, critics of traditional philanthropy say many nonprofit
groups that rely on foundation money - even organizations with good
leaders, worthy missions, and vast potential - are chronically undercapitalized
and often struggle to survive.
- Proponents of venture philanthropy also content that typical foundation
grants are too short-term to help struggling charities get on a sound
footing.
- They say social impacts are not being realized using traditional methods.
Stereotypes held by members of both Business and Nonprofit worlds
"Business groups often assume the nonprofit sector is dysfunctional,
but that's not true. There are good executives and managers in the nonprofit
sector. They lack support. Conversely, the nonprofit assumes the business
guy is going to come in and just apply all the business rules and therefore
break their mission, break their spirit, and break their soul. And that's
not true either."
"Many nonprofits struggle with insufficient resources. Nonprofits are
chronically undercapitalized. They have been compassionate and committed
service providers but inattentive institution builders, focusing most
of their energies and resources externally rather than building and
supporting their own capacity." Morino
Traditional funders tend to tie donations to programs that directly impact
'clients', leaving it to the nonprofits to find money to keep the lights
on. But operational effectiveness is as important to the venture philanthropist
as an innovative program." Peter Delevett, Bizjournals.com,
"Venture Philanthropists Hope to Tap New Wealth"
In their comprehensive report "Assessing
Venture Philanthropy," written by three former students in the Harvard
Business School course on social entrepreneurship. authors Christopher
Capers, Michael Collins and Shahna Gooneratne write:
"Although today venture philanthropy is currently a small share of all
giving, it is a significant trend. There are three reasons why venture
philanthropy has the potential to significantly change today's nonprofit
world:
- there is a generation of young self-made wealthy that dislike traditional
philanthropy. . . .
- primary sources of operating funding are evaporating. . . . . Government's
role is reduced, resources of the United Way are declining in many areas.
. . .
- there is an emerging hybrid sector "nonprofit for-profit organizations"
that run as revenue-generating businesses which pursue a social mission."
The Edna McConnell Clark
Foundation say success in using venture philanthropy would result
in at least four conditions:
- A marked increased in the output and productivity of the field as
a whole and of several significant institutions in it.
- Some organizations in the field, either intermediaries or significant
front-line organizations achieve the status of bell-weathers or 'great
institutions', whose activities lead and publicly represent the field.
- More revenue-generating capacity - and probably more revenue - in
the field as a whole.
- Significantly better means of measuring quality, production and outcomes.
"A sea change in philanthropic giving, an unprecedented wealth creation
of the New Economy and an Internet-enabled transformation in organizational
effectiveness are converging to create an extraordinary opportunity
to work in new and different ways to meet society's most vexing and
long-standing social problems." -- Venture
Philanthropy Partners
The article by Diane Gingold in FORTUNE, May 2000 "New
Frontiers in Philanthropy" details the workings of venture philanthropy.
Diane says,
"In the past, the majority of philanthropists relied on established
organizations to identify problems and deliver solutions, but now the
Internet is allowing the public to renegotiate its relationship to the
social sector.
"Today individuals who wish to be personally involved in social change
can turn to the Internet for a communications link and virtual global
arena where they can convene with similar individuals or groups seeking
to impact specific social problems without the assistance of an intermediary
organization."
Harvard Business School professor James Austin has written
a new book "The Collaborative Challenge" (Jossey-Bass). In it he quotes
John Whitehead, former chairman of Goldman Sachs, who says:
"Don't think this is some kind of charitable thing where you will
be rewarded in heaven. You get rewarded right away because you'll be known
as a company that is conscious of its social responsibility; you'll attract
better quality employees; your stock will sell at a higher multiple; and
all sorts of good things will come out of it."
<<Prev | Intro
| Next >>
|