CharityVillage.com logo

QuickGuides Nonprofit Neighbourhood Volunteer & Donate Resources and Library Marketplace Supplier Directory Campus News & Events Jobs Advertise Main/Home
  News & Events
   
   Path:  Main Street : NewsWeek : Archive : Funder Focus : Article

This is an archive of CharityVillage NewsWeek. To find a word on the page, use your browser's "find" feature (CTRL-F or CMD-F).
To view other articles in the archive, use our Chronological Index.

Please note: While we ensure that all links and e-mail addresses are accurate at their publishing date, the quick-changing nature of the web means that some links to other web sites and e-mail addresses may no longer be accurate.


Funder Focus: Donna Balkan and the Canada Council for the Arts

October 7, 2002
By Nicole Zummach

This month in our continuing series of interviews with some of Canada's leading funders, we feature the Canada Council for the Arts, which was established by parliament in 1957 to foster and promote the study, production, and enjoyment of the arts. CharityVillage spoke with senior communications manager Donna Balkan, about the council's relationship with government, its impact on the career development of artists, and the importance of investing in the arts.

CharityVillage: What does the council, as an arm's length government agency, feel are its responsibilities, not only to Canadian artists but also to the general public?

Donna Balkan: One of the things that I think is very important to note is that when the Canada Council was founded in 1957, the intention was always that it be established at arm's length from government. In fact, in the Massey Commission Report, which was a Royal Commission report that resulted in the creation of the Canada Council, it was specifically noted that a national arts funding agency should be arm's length and that there should not be political interference in decisions regarding artists and organizations who get funding. So that was the intention from the very beginning. Certainly the Canada Council's mandate has not changed that much in the last 45 years.

If you look at our mission statement, which comes from the Canada Council Act, it talks about supporting and promoting the creation and production of works in the arts, and the enjoyment of works in the arts. So, we really have a dual mandate. There is the whole grants process, which provides financial support and services to artists and arts organizations across the country, but we also have an important role in promoting the arts and promoting the importance of the arts with the Canadian public, an advocacy function or an arts awareness function.

CV: How does being affiliated with government affect how the council conducts its business and handle grants and awards?

DB: Government has an effect on the Canada Council to the extent that we are part of the Department of Canadian Heritage portfolio. We report to Parliament through the Minister of Canadian Heritage like other portfolio agencies, but we are not part of the Department of Canadian Heritage. Our status is basically that of a Crown Corporation, similar to the CBC or the National Film Board. We can't say that we are not at all affected by government. After all, our primary source of funding is a parliamentary appropriation, and when I say it is our primary source of revenue, and not our only source of revenue, it is because we also have a number of endowment funds, primarily related to our prizes and rewards programs.

CV: Is your peer assessment process delivering the impartiality and objectivity it was designed to deliver?

DB:
Selection and evaluation of grant proposals has been done by a peer assessment system since the very beginning in 1957. We have approximately 120 different competitions every year, all with peer assessment committees of artists and specialist in the particular discipline or arts practice being assessed. If you take a look at an area like new media, and what is happening in the media arts, the changes are enormous and constant. So it is very important that the people who are making the recommendations, that are doing the assessing, are people who are knowledgeable about the art form they are assessing, and are knowledgeable about current trends and what is happening in the arts. It is that knowledge and expertise that we are seeking from our peer assessors. I don't think that can be replaced by anyone.

CV: You mentioned the dynamic nature of media arts. Is technology changing the face of the arts community?

DB: In the early years of Canada Council, film for example, was supported under visual art, but as time went on and areas like film, video, audio, and now of course new media grew, it became clear to the council that there was a need to create a separate media arts section that specializes in that area. Media arts is now one of our fastest growing areas of application.

If you take a look at the art itself, technology is having an enormous impact and not just on artists who specialize in media arts. It has influenced artists in a wide range of disciplines. For example, at one time way back in history when you were talking about visual arts you were talking about painting and sculpture. Now when you talk about visual art, you are talking about a whole range of art practices. One thing that I found very fascinating was a year ago at the 2001 Venice Biennial, which is the world's most important and prestigious exhibition of contemporary visual art, Canada won a major award for a work called 'The Paradise Institute' by two Lethbridge artists named Janet Cardiff and George Bures Miller. That work was a multimedia work and it won a top prize at what was traditionally considered a visual art exhibition.

If somebody asked me what I felt was the biggest, most important trend in the arts today, I probably would not say technology. I would say multi-disciplinarity, because the artistic boundaries between the artistic disciplines are blurring. You can no longer say, 'well this is visual art, and this is theatre, and this is music'. I think that technology has been a major force behind the multi-disciplinarity that is taking place, because artists in all disciplines are recognizing that technology has some very important uses. It also imposed certain challenges on the artists, primarily related to intellectual property rights.

People are posting all sorts of things on the Internet, and as we know from the whole story of Napster with regard to music, there are some very serious intellectual property issues. Intellectual property laws and society's behaviour in the area of intellectual properties has to adjust to this new world of technology, where things can be disseminated instantly. That can pose certain difficulties for artists, but on the other hand, the ability to disseminate information about art through technology is an amazing tool. For example, people who live in a small community that doesn't have an art museum can go online and learn all about Canadian art and actually see works of art on the Internet that they would not have had access to twenty years ago.

CV: The Art Bank celebrates its 30th anniversary this year. Perhaps you could tell me about its importance to Canada and Canadian artists.

DB: The Art Bank was created in 1972, and was originally created to rent art to government, specifically federal government agencies and departments. That mandate has now been broaden somewhat and about 12% of the Art Bank's clients are in the corporate sector. The Art Bank has about 18,000 pieces of Canadian contemporary art and is the largest collection of its kind in the world. It is very important for Canadian artists because it purchases their art, and there is a certain prestige attached to having one or more works of art in the Art Bank's collection if you are a contemporary artist. It is also wonderful in terms of creating awareness about Canadian contemporary art because Art Bank art can be found all over the country.

CV: In 1999 you conducted a study on the impact of council grants on the lives and careers of grant recipients. What were some of the key findings from that study?

DB:We do a lot of research. When people say research and development they always think about science and industry. The Canada Council is also in the business of supporting research and development because artists are researchers and developers, artists experiment, artists take risks in the same ways as scientists do. The other thing that is very important to us is the notion of investing in the arts. It is not just a question of giving someone a grant so they can go paint a painting. It is that we're investing in a career in the case of individual artists, or investing in an institution as in the case of an arts organization.

That particular study was interesting because all of our information before that study was very anecdotal. For example, Margaret Atwood received a Canada Council grant in 1969 when she was just starting out as a professional writer. She has said many times that the $7,000 grant we gave her in 1969 had an incredible impact on her career because it allowed her to go on writing when she would not have been able to do so otherwise. So we had all of this anecdotal information and we decided to conduct a survey of individual artists who had received grants from the Canada Council. We asked them what impact these grants had made on their careers and what we found was that things had not changed much since 1969. Artists told us that it gave them the freedom to pursue their work. It allowed them artistic development, career development, and educational opportunities, because one of the things Canada Council grants are used for is to pursue further study for professional artists. All of this basically confirmed the anecdotal information that we had in the past, that even a small grant can make a significant impact.

CV: A focus of concern among some arts organizations right now is how to sustain and attract professional management in the arts. Is the council supporting professional development within arts organizations?

DB: The council absolutely recognizes the importance of arts management. It is extremely, extremely important. One of the things our peer assessment committees look at when considering operating funding for an organizations is the way in which the organization is managed because there is a very close relationship between the financial sustainability of an organization and the efficiency and effectiveness of the organization's management. We have a program in the theatre and in the dance sections called the Flying Squad which allows arts organizations in those disciplines to hire consultants that will give them advice on management and administrative issues. It is a very popular program.

Arts organizations have to do everything they can to ensure their sustainability. We all know, as well as anybody, that funding is very tight, and even though the Canada Council's funding has been increased over the past couple of years, the demand is also going up. We know that there is a lot of competition for public sector funding, and that there is also a lot of competition for private sector funding. We would like to see more private sector and individual philanthropic funding of the arts. Although the Canada Council is constantly talking about the importance of public sector funding and we are clearly committed to the importance of public sector arts funding and think that the public sector should take the lead, we also say that we cannot have a vital, dynamic, and sustainable arts community without support from the private sector, both corporations and individual philanthropists.

CV: The Canada Council is an older and well-established institution. How does it keep itself vital and relevant to artists and arts organization?

DB: Well part of that is the artists. You can't help but keep yourself vital and relevant when you are around artists all the time. As I said, artists are always at the forefront. They are always keeping us informed and because we work with artists it is our business to always be informed, and knowing, and moving, and finding out what is going on. We have a board which changes, there is a certain amount of continuity, but there are always new people coming on. It is very important that a lot of our staff are from the arts community. There are a lot of people with very strong professional arts backgrounds. They come out of the arts community and some of them spend a couple of years with the council and then decide that they want to go back and devote more time to their art. So it's constantly moving but I think that the staff and the board see themselves as being very close to the arts community and we have to be, because of the nature of our jobs.

Donna Balkan has been with the Canada Council for the Arts for the past three years. Prior to that, she worked for the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade and the Canadian Human Rights Commission. She has also been a journalist for the Ottawa Citizen and CBC Radio. For more information about the council, visit: www.canadacouncil.ca.

Home   About CharityVillage  |  Free Newsletter  |  Media Centre  |  Contact Us
   Terms and Conditions of Use  |  Privacy Policy    © CharityVillage Ltd.  All rights reserved.    Email help@charityvillage.com